In men’s sports, there are losers
and winners; in women’s, victims and ‘perps’. Those journalists
who are most obsequious toward male champions in their moments
of triumph turn on their female equivalents at like times and
dress them down as though they were delinquent schoolgirls.
We’ve seen it time and again in boxing, but perhaps the most
absurd instance came at Roland Garros after Steffi Graf had won
the final of the French Open 6-0, 6-0, when a journalist (who
would doubtless be fawning like a spaniel at the feet Rafael
Nadal if he ever he managed a like accomplishment) greeted her
at the press conference with an indignant: “Couldn’t you at
least have let her win one game?”
Well, no,
actually. The proper business of athletes in the arena is to
give the fullest possible expression to their talent; and if
that means from time to time that opponents get crushed, so be
it. Sport is a form of self-expression. It’s a celebration of
the best that can be achieved with the body in the same way that
poetry, say, or pure mathematics show us the best that can be
done with the mind. We are all the richer for the great
athletes among us; and to ask Steffi Graf to play badly on
purpose to spare the blushes of an opponent is as preposterous
as to expect Mozart to write muzak to assuage the envy of
Salieri.
*
There was an instance last month
in Uruguay: That country’s males having tried ten times and
failed on each occasion to land a world championship of any
description in professional boxing, 20-year-old Chris Namús went
from curiosity to celebrity overnight on the 20th when she won
the WIBA Youth title at super lightweight. The whole country,
apparently, stayed up until the early hours of Sunday morning to
watch the fight. The President himself was on hand to fasten the
belt around her waist. When she went to the Estadio
Centenario the next day to watch Peñarol, she was mobbed by
fans demanding an autograph or to have their photo taken with
her. Even so, there was one curmudgeon in the sub-editors’
department of La República who couldn’t resist a shot:
Beneath a picture of Namús with her arms raised in triumph after
the stoppage appeared the caption “Champion of the World” and
beneath that:
Miss Congeniality. In the early hours of yesterday
morning, Chris Namus [sic] crowned herself World Youth Champion
after defeating her Mexican opponent by knockout in front of a
crowd in the Palacio Peñarol that cheered her as though she were
a great idol. The President, Tabaré Vásquez, was present and
climbed into the ring to congratulate her warmly.
*
Whether it was meant
sarcastically or not, ‘Miss Congeniality’ is a far from inapt
title for the young Uruguayan. In a beautiful piece in La
Observa, Antonio Álvarez wrote: It was almost touching to
see Chris Namús [at the end of the fight] embrace her
opponent, aware of the suffering this defeat would entail,
before beginning her own legitimate celebrations as champion.
And earlier: In boxing, the dualities of the human condition
– heroism and cowardice, urbanity and savagery, etc. – weigh as
in no other sport. ..; moreover, it has one extraordinary
feature: even the most rude and illiterate of boxers become
acquainted with their personal limitations and come to recognize
the skills of their opponents as part of the process of
competing. Even the most punchy and mononeural of boxers learns
to accept that triumph is simply a passing contingency in a
world in which one is better or worse according to whom one is
confronted by and how well one has prepared for the moment of
truth. The secret of boxing is to be the best version of
yourself, which is more important than the result.
I have to admit that I still haven't got used to watching
women's boxing, but Saturday's fight .. proved that there too it
is possible to maintain a spirit of camaraderie and urbanity
despite the ultimate objective being to exchange blows. What was
notable over and above the thrashing the Uruguayan girl gave her
Mexican opponent was to see them together on television
programmes prior to the fight, exchanging experiences with a
great deal of respect - one would almost say with personal
empathy.
*
Tabaré Vázquez is one of the most
interesting of the world’s political leaders. As well as being
his country’s president, he is also one of its leading cancer
specialists and manages to combine the practice of medicine with
exercise of the highest political office. “Practicing medicine
is not only my vocation, it gives me an opportunity to continue
to be in direct contact with people, to see them and hear their
needs,” he explained. “I’d feel empty and isolated if I couldn’t
practice my profession and had to give up that contact.” During
a recent diplomatic visit to Italy, he took time off to address
a conference on oncology. A master of consensus, he presides
over the broadest of broad-left coalitions. In a memorable
image, a South American diplomat once told Larry Richter of the
New York Times that Dr. Vázquez reminded him of “one of those
dog walkers you see in the park: He’s got a dozen animals
straining to go off in different directions and always yapping
at each other, and he’s struggling to keep the whole pack under
control.” He is a man, his supporters say, who likes to build
coalitions and not leave anybody on the side of the road.
“Perhaps because he is a doctor,” says Senator Rafael Michelini,
“he has always been humble and would rather save a life or a
situation than reap personal glory.”
A staunch supporter of boxing, Dr Vázquez was the instigator of
the ‘Knock Out Drugs’ campaign designed to wean the country’s
youth off narcotics and inculcate a healthier lifestyle. In the
three years since its inception, the programme has exceeded all
expectations, with 3,520 adolescents (34.5% of them female)
currently enrolled in 62 academies scattered throughout the
country. As well as learning how to box, young people
participating in the programme are taught other life skills,
such as hygiene and nutrition. Health care and help with their
diet is included but conditional upon their pursuit of a course
of study alongside their sporting activities. To the
professionals on the programme, who include not only Chris Namús
but also Caril “Ratón” Herrera and Rafael Sosa Pintos, the deal
includes free lodging and use of the facilities of the Uruguayan
army for training.
In an interview Namús gave La República a week after the fight,
she said: “Twice that evening, I was overcome by emotion: when I
entered the stadium and realized it was packed, and when he [Dr
Vásquez] gave me a hug. Just imagine: the highest authority in
the country was with me that evening! It meant a great deal to
me. I feel tremendous affection for the person of the
President.”
She’s not alone. “Uruguayans by nature are very stinting in
their praise and highly critical [of their politicians],” says
Luis Eduardo González, the Director of the polling organization
CIFRA; yet three years into his mandate, President Vásquez’s
approval rating stands at 57% (with only 23% disapproving). “In
Uruguay, I’ve never seen anything like it.”
*
Equally unheard of was the
Palacio Peñarol selling out for an evening of boxing. According
to El País it was the first time this had ever happened,
and the Namús vs Hernández fight was the top of the bill.
Opponents of the sport in countries like Venezuela (where it’s
still illegal) and England (where it hasn’t been allowed to take
root) are fond of saying that “no one wants to watch women
boxing”, but the evidence from countries like Germany, France,
Argentina, Mexico and now Uruguay indicates that given even
remotely the same amount of publicity, women fighters are just
as capable of packing stadiums and generating advertising
revenue as their male equivalents. Regina Halmich regularly drew
a live TV audience of seven million or more, and her last fight
was watched by just under nine million Germans alone. Taking the
relative population of the two countries into account, that is
equivalent to a TV audience of 33.4 million in the States.
*
For Namús, the sobriquet ‘Bombón Asesino’
(‘Gorgeous Assassin’ or ‘Killer Peach’ - take your pick), which
she’s always hated, was becoming an embarrassment. After poking and
prodding her way to a string of uninspiring points decisions, which
were even booed on occasion, she found her game here when it most
mattered. “I’d always insisted that I wasn’t a knock-out artist,”
she said, “which is not to say that I’d never gone looking for a
knockout. This was the first time, though, that I really felt
powerful and that I was hitting hard, and I went all out to ensure
my opponent felt it too. My fists found their mark and the end came
faster than expected.”
“Namús only needed 1 min 50 seconds to
annihilate her opponent,” wrote Dani Alonso Jr for Lo Mejor del
Boxeo, but those 110 seconds included a standing count. Stunned
by a left-right combination, the Mexican girl was caught by an
uppercut and a right to the temple as she tried to make for the
ropes, and the fight was effectively over. The Argentinian referee
gave her a standing count but, as the commentator pointed out, she
was only semi-conscious. Namús retired to a neutral corner (only for
the referee to direct her to that of her Mexican opponent) and stood
there sucking air into her lungs. Within seconds of the resumption,
Hernández was in trouble again, staggering backwards, gliding her
hand along the top rope as though it were a banister, and this time
the referee brought the proceedings to a definitive halt. “It was an
intense fight from the start,” explained the referee. “I gave the
Mexican girl one more chance, but she was very groggy, which is why
I stopped the fight. The Uruguayan girl is very powerful and has
very long arms.”
“He was right to stop it,” conceded
Hernández. “She hits really hard and I felt those punches. There was
no way I could recover in time.” It was several minutes, apparently,
before her head cleared.
*
The two were said to be disputing the
WIBA ‘Youth’ title, which is limited to fighters beneath the ages of
either 21 or 22 (depending upon which source you believe). Since,
however, Hernández’s age was given by most sources (including her
own local paper) as 22 and by
El País, which
conducted a long interview with the fighter, as 27, that hypothesis
looks a bit sick – especially since the names being touted for
Namús’s first challenger are those of Tanyah Freeman, who (according
to El País) is 35, Wendy La Motta, who according to Boxrec was born
in 1972, and Letícia Rojo, who by her own admission was born in
1982. On the other hand, those journalists who concluded it was in
fact the full WIBA Super Lightweight title that the two were
disputing must also be wrong, since that title (currently held by
Duda Yankovich) is said to be Namús’s long-term objective.
It makes no sense, but never mind; suffice it to say they were
fighting for a belt. There are so many of the cumbersome things in
the sport that no one can be expected to keep track of all of them.
Besides which, a belt, at the best of times, is nothing more than a
‘maguffin’, which in Hitchcock parlance is a bone of contention the
exact nature and significance of which are of no importance but
which serves as a plot device.
*
Hernández, a design student who enjoys
creating web sites, had arrived in Montevideo ten days in advance of
the fight with her trainer, whom she shares with Cristian Mijares.
The pair surprised the Uruguayans with immediate demands for a hotel
with a gymnasium and a sparring partner the same height as Namús.
“Cripes!” thought Amaya, the co-promoter. “They’ve come to win!”
*
A journalist visiting the offices of WBC
Executive Secretary Mauricio Sulaimán recently was struck by the
comeliness of the female champions whose pictures were on the wall.
“How come you’re all so pretty?” he asked
Zulina Muñoz.
“Aren’t you
afraid of losing your looks? Are women boxers less vain than other
women?” “Actually,” replied ‘La Loba’, “it was vanity that got me
into boxing in the first place. I went to the gym to lose weight.”
The photogenic (and
much photographed) Bombón Asesino is said to have turned down
long-term modelling contracts. As well as being tall and sublimely
proportioned, she has an Evangelista-like talent for reinventing
herself from public appearance to public appearance and even from
shot to shot – not always successfully it has to be said, perhaps
because she does lack vanity; that strange cap, for example, (no
doubt foisted upon her by a sponsor) that she wore for the anthems
made her look clownish and gawky, but some extraordinary photographs
emerged from the fight. Even when we know from the video that she’s
pulverizing her opponent as the shutters click, in the stills she
seems lost in a kind of reverie, like Rodin in Stefan Zweig’s
account of the sculptor at work, so utterly absorbed in the pursuit
of perfection that he forgets altogether that there’s someone else
in the room. The referee breaks in on her as she’s applying the
finishing touches, wielding her glove as adroitly as a paintbrush.
But for the interruption, one could imagine her standing back a
moment later to contemplate the effect.

What she does, of
course, is go berserk; and you can see that, with her squeals of
celebration as she rides around the ring on the shoulders of her
trainer, she’s twisting the knife in the gut of the vanquished
Mexican. But without realizing she’s doing so, until, yes, the
thought does perhaps occur to her, and she climbs down and goes over
a second time to her opponent to console her, clasping her in a long
embrace: “What was I telling her? That the real boxers are the ones
that pick themselves up. I could see she was distressed, with tears
in her eyes that were attributable to more than the mere pain of the
punches, and I put myself in her position. I told her not to worry;
that she'd had everything against her, and that that had made it
very difficult for her,” Namús explained. “ I wouldn't have liked it
in her position, if everyone had just left me alone while my
opponent was celebrating."
Later Namús went round to the hotel where her opponent was staying.
"I’d bought her a present and wanted to say goodbye because she was
leaving early the next morning. She's a very humble and unassuming
girl, I realized from our brief conversation. We're going to keep in
touch. What I’d have liked would have been to take her to the
Feria de Tristán Narvaja (Montevideo's famous flea market).
Unfortunately it wasn’t possible."
*
Two days earlier.
Another country. Another belt. Here, it’s the Mexican Flyweight
title, won only ten weeks earlier by Sandra Hernández, that’s at
stake, the challenger being ‘the female De La Hoya’, ex world
champion Mariana Juárez, who’s been out of the country for six years
and out of the sport for eleven months – injured, initially, and
later, giving birth. The bill is entitled ‘Perfume de Nocaut’, which
we don’t need Babel Fish to translate.
Juárez shows no signs of ring rust. As expected, her height is a
decisive advantage. Fast as her fists may be, Hernández can’t use
them because she can’t get close enough. Mariana teases and torments
her, changing her stance repeatedly to prevent the youngster
developing any kind of rhythm, goading her from a safe distance with
the jab and hurting her with hard counters when she attempts to
respond. La Jornada compares them to a rapier and a tank, except
that when Juárez does get careless and the champion does her worst,
the artillery makes no impression – the tank is firing blanks –
whereas the rapier, it appears, is armour-piercing. As well as
humiliated, the young champion is getting hurt. It’s a bit like a
bullfight. In the red corner, anger and muscle: in the blue corner,
sang froid and steel. No charge goes unsanctioned; each time a fresh
wound is inflicted. Banderilla or vara, Juárez never steps aside
without striking; the next day, there will be bruises all over her
opponent’s face and neck.
A bullfight has three acts (or tercios), and at the beginning of the
final tercio, the faena, in which the bull will be killed, the
matador dedicates it to some individual, often a friend. Juárez has
already told us for whom she will be fighting – her baby daughter,
Daphne, who means everything to her and for whom she now has to
provide – and can dispense with the formalities. If anyone else has
a baby daughter in the precincts of the arena, parental discretion
is advised.
“Juárez cruised through the first nine rounds,” writes Alfredo Jaime
Gómez “but in the tenth she suddenly stepped up the pace”. Hernández
had been adamant at the press conference that there could be no
knockout because “we each know the other too well to permit
ourselves to be struck where it does most damage”, but Juárez had
gainsaid her, and now she proves her point. She’s left herself two
minutes – eight less than a matador is allowed, but more, it turns
out, than she needs. Dazed by a succession of jolting right hands,
Hernández leaves her jaw exposed, and the kill is as clean as one
could wish it: a right cross to the point of the chin – the brain’s
Reset button – and while her nervous system is scrambling
frantically to reboot, she’s defenceless: out on her feet. There are
only six seconds remaining but the referee has no option but to stop
the fight.
*
Juárez’s triumph is
greeted in the hall with an ovation and in the press with headlines
like “Mariana crushes a rock”. Returning from a long layoff and
fighting in Mexico for the first time in six years, she has
surpassed everyone’s expectations, not only outsmarting but
outlasting her younger opponent, with an exhilarating burst of speed
in the home straight that electrifies and excites the crowd. Mexico
City is the home of both women, but it’s from the slender waist of
Juárez that the keys of the city now dangle on their golden chain.
She looks like a mermaid at times with those golden braids. She’s no
such thing though. The first woman, with Ana María Torres, ever to
box professionally in a macho, predominantly Catholic country, she’s
fought injustice, innuendo, injury, indifference… – all the ‘in...‘
things – as well as harassment and hostility in the gymnasiums, and
she’s beaten, or beating, them all. This time she and Hernández were
the main attraction with the male bouts padding the bill, and they
drew a big crowd, too. The ‘Perfume de Nocaut’ is a fragrance that
sells, it would appear, even in Mexico, and the next gate no doubt
will be bigger still. This fight, she had said, would be ‘a
springboard’ to project her back onto the international stage.
Afterwards she confessed: “if I’d lost, it would have been all over
for me.”
She and Torres, with their blood-soaked, internecine encounters,
proved long ago to everyone willing to be convinced that the women
could be just as tough as the men. But there was no last act, no
climax, no catharsis on those occasions; the two fighters cancelled
each other out; and the criticism persisted that women’s fights are
boring because they lead nowhere. They won’t be saying that again in
Mexico City for a while.
*
Hernández is as
magnificent in defeat as Juárez in victory. She might have been
forgiven for supposing that Juárez had done her utmost to make her
evening as painful and humiliating as possible. First off, the ex
world champion should have been defending the Mexican title on the
16th July not challenging for it: If she hadn´t stood aside in May
and let Hernández dispute the newly inaugurated title with the more
highly ranked Gabriela ‘La Pelusa’ González, she’d have defeated
González (almost certainly) and Hernández would have entered last
night’s fight as the challenger, from which position there’s rather
less distance to fall. She might also, when owning that Hernández
hadn’t become Mexican champion by accident, have pointed out that
she herself hadn’t become world champion by accident either, instead
of just letting the youngster run her mouth off and then making her
look ridiculous in the ring. It might have been kinder, too, either
to knock her out sin demora or let the fight go the distance, but
not toy with her for nine rounds and knock her out six seconds from
the end. But there’s no self-pity, no rancour and no hint of
reproach either in Hernández’s manner or in her words. If so much as
one of those thoughts has crossed her mind, she accepts evidently
that boxing is (to use the Spanish phrase) la ley de la más fuerte
(the survival of the fittest or, literally, ‘the dominion of the
strongest’) and that – within the limits of the rules – as long as
Juárez remains the stronger, it is her writ that runs and she can do
as she damn well pleases.
There are no sour grapes, either, from Hernández. When she consents
(rather bravely) to give an interview the next day to la Jornada,
she makes no secret of the fact that she’s in pain – ‘physical and
mental’ – and little attempt either to conceal the fact that she’s
been crying: She speaks with the thin voice of someone who has
suffered an upsetting experience. She wants to ‘understand’, to
‘assimilate’, her defeat. “Being beaten,” she says, “can be useful”.
She remembers a time during her amateur career when she put together
a whole string of victories. “My enthusiasm began to wane,” she
says, “and I became almost lethargic.”
Hers isn’t the routine (learned) reaction of the ‘good sport’. Nor
is it the spiteful cataloguing of symptoms we see sometimes from
beaten fighters that is designed not only to enlist our sympathy
(which is fair enough) but also to invoke our anger (which is not,
because their idea is that we will direct it at their opponents). We
see it rarely and only from female fighters it has to be said, for
whom, on occasion, the disappointment, perceived humiliation and
raging impotence of defeat becomes a cocktail so unpalatable that,
rather than just swallow it and get on with their lives, they resort
to passive aggression (“look what she did to me, daddy!”) as a way
of getting even.
Hernández doesn’t. Even though she’s only 23 – and had even seemed
younger at the weigh-in, when she let Mariana Juárez braid her hair
for her and put her arm round her as though she were her baby sister
as they posed with the belt – she exhibits remarkable maturity in
defeat, blaming her failure on lack of professional experience but
remaining proud of past accomplishments. And rightly so. Not only
are almost all the girls she’s defeated (some forty-six in all in
her career as an amateur and two since she turned pro) taller than
her, but she’s holding down two jobs (in a toy factory and in a
street market) plus boxing at the same time.
And she shouldn’t even be alive. Five years ago she was knocked down
by a car and spent two days in a coma. The doctors thought she’d
suffered severe brain damage and were afraid also that they’d have
to amputate her leg, which was broken in three places. Her thorax,
too, was broken and she suffered an injury to one eye. “The doctors
said it would be better if I died,” she told La Jornada, “because
(if I survived) I’d be mad or one leg shy.”
Mad is what she went later, when she was confined to bed for three
months (“I wanted to fight the whole world. It was then that I
became aggressive”), but the physical injuries healed. A year after
the accident, however, she plunged into a severe depression from
which boxing offered a way out. She threw herself into it with utter
conviction. “When you’ve felt death that close, it changes you for
ever,” she says. “You feel you’ve survived for a reason. I believe
I’m here because I have unfinished business.”
Even though in the event, as she now sees, her experience in the
amateur division didn’t cancel out that of Juárez in the pros, she
remains proud of her achievements. In her flat in the colony
Ejército de Oriente, she shows the interviewer her trophies, her
‘golden’ gloves, the cards on which she’s featured, the press
clippings mentioning her name. What two days earlier had been the
centrepiece of the display – the Mexican flyweight championship belt
– is conspicuous, of course, by its absence.
“There’s nothing to be done now,” she says with resignation, but
stops there, reminding herself, as Namús will remind the other
Hernández two days later, that “all of them – even the greatest
champions – have been defeated at some time or other.”
*
On the 22nd, J.
Arturo Contreras reported: “The new Mexican flyweight champion,
Mariana Juárez [15(8)-5-3] visited the offices of the Federal Boxing
Commission on Monday, where she was eulogized by the members, boxing
journalists and managers who gather there once a week. Juárez, an ex
world champion, offered last week a demonstration of intelligent
boxing and power to dethrone the far-from-negligible Sandra
Hernández [2(1)-2(2)-0]. Hernández is a brave girl, who left her
heart in the ring. In the end, though, her own lack of experience
and the boxing resources of Mariana combined to close the door on
any surprise. If she learns a bit of defence, Sandra will be a
strong candidate for both domestic and international titles.
Commissioner Jaime Clavel described Juárez and Hernández as having
been 'the protagonists of an exciting fight from which emerged a new
national champion and future champion of the world."
*
Mariana Juárez
returns to the ring in Tijuana this evening to fight Diana González
for the WBC International title, weighing in yesterday at 50.1
kilograms to her opponent’s 51. The ‘Bombón Asesino’, for her
part, returns to the Palacio Peñarol on the 13th September on a bill
named in her honour ‘¡NAMÚS ATACA DE NUEVO!’. In the weeks since the
fight, she has scarcely been out of the limelight. There were at
least four clips of her triumph on You Tube last time I
looked, posted by fans appending predicates like ‘The Most Beautiful
Boxer in the World’ to her name. She’s been supplementing her income
again by modelling and was granted the ultimate accolade of a spot
on Uruguayan TV’s ‘Celebrity Bowling’.
The losers, as is often the case, seem to have dropped completely
off the radar. Against the ‘rock’ (Sandra Hernández), the Fates seem
to have conspired with particular cruelty. The cup has been dashed
from her hands just as she was raising it to her lips. No sooner had
she established herself as the best at her weight in her home
country – on the launch-pad, as she put it, of an international
career – than the ex- (and perhaps rightful) world champion returns
like Odysseus after a long absence, and she is routed, and the rest
of the suitors along with her.
One got the sense during the build-up to the fight from headlines
like ‘Sandra Hernández facing a baptism of fire!’ that people knew
this would happen and were rubbing their hands with glee. I could
understand the girl she defeated to take the title in the first
place resenting perhaps Hernández’s habit of dragging her name into
every interview and reminding everyone that she had entered that
fight too as the underdog; and Hernández was perhaps naive to
conclude from the fact that Juárez hadn’t hurt her when they’d
sparred together on an earlier occasion that she was incapable of
doing so in a real fight, but you’d really have to have overdosed on
Greek tragedy to conclude she was punished justly for her arrogance
(or hubris as the ‘Lit. Crit.’ brigade used to call it until
Greek scholars set them straight). She was a little brash (in a
sweet way), and she overstated her chances, but that’s no crime. I
don’t suppose in any case that Juárez drew out her agony on purpose
to punish her for anything she’d said. It’s more likely that, unsure
after a year out of action as to whether or not she could go the
full distance, she held back in the early stages to obviate the risk
of gassing and leaving herself vulnerable at the end. As Namús
herself pointed out in the interview with La República,
punching hard is very tiring; the choice she (Namús) made was to go
flat out from the start and see whether or not her punches were
hurting; if not, she planned to throttle back to conserve energy.
Juárez appears to have made the opposite choice and delayed her
sprint until she was sure she had enough stamina to sustain it to
the line.
Like the Uruguayan, too, she was perhaps uncertain as to what would
be the effect of an all-out attack and first fully aware of her own
strength when she tightened her grip in the last round, and the rock
crumbled like biscuit through her fingers.
